Practices betting on wearable and remote patient data as a new revenue line need to slow down. The reimbursement rules, coding pathways, and clinical workflows aren’t ready, and that means the data sitting in a patient’s smartwatch isn’t turning into a paid claim anytime soon. If your practice already stretched staff or budget to get ahead of this trend, the smarter move is fixing your cash flow today, not waiting on a payer system to catch up.
What happened
A survey cited by the American Medical Association found that physicians have access to more patient-generated data than ever, blood pressure readings, heart rate variability, sleep patterns, glucose trends, but most of it never makes it into a billable clinical encounter. AMA CEO Dr. John Whyte put it bluntly: the data exists, but there’s no reliable way to route it into clinical workflow. No workflow, no documentation. No documentation, no clean claim. Read the original reporting at Healthcare Dive.
This isn’t a minor technical hiccup. Remote physiologic monitoring and remote therapeutic monitoring CPT codes exist, but documentation requirements, device attestation, and payer-specific rules vary enough that a lot of practices either bill incorrectly, under-bill, or skip it entirely. Staff don’t have time to babysit a dashboard. EHRs weren’t built to ingest a firehose of wearable data cleanly. And payers are still deciding how much of this they’ll actually reimburse.
What it means for practice cash flow
Practices that invested in remote monitoring programs, patient engagement platforms, or staff training around this data are carrying cost now against revenue that may not show up for months, if it shows up at all. That’s a familiar pattern in healthcare: you spend on equipment, software, and labor upfront, and you collect on a claims cycle that can run 30, 60, sometimes 90 days out even when everything is coded right. Add ambiguity about whether a service is billable at all, and you’ve got a practice sitting on receivables that are slower and less certain than usual.
Smaller practices feel this hardest. A hospital system can absorb a stalled monitoring program as a line item. A five-physician practice or a solo internist running remote monitoring for 40 patients can’t. Payroll, rent, and supply costs don’t pause while you wait for CMS or a commercial payer to clarify a code. If you’re already factoring receivables or thinking about it, this is exactly the kind of gap that invoice factoring for medical practices was built to close.
Where financing fits
For a medical practice, the right tool here is invoice factoring, not a term loan. Factoring turns your existing accounts receivable, the claims you’ve already billed and are waiting on payers to pay, into cash in days instead of months. It doesn’t require you to solve the wearable data reimbursement puzzle first. It just requires that you have billed, valid claims sitting in your AR aging report.
If your practice is carrying delayed reimbursements from monitoring programs, denied or pending RPM/RTM claims, or just a slower payer mix than usual, factoring gets working capital moving now so payroll and overhead don’t become the crisis while you wait for coding clarity. Advance rates, fees, and speed of funding all vary by credit profile, payer mix, and are subject to underwriting, nothing here is guaranteed, but the structure is designed for exactly this kind of receivables lag.
If cash needs are broader than AR, like funding new monitoring equipment or a workflow integration project, a short-term working capital loan can complement factoring rather than replace it. Equipment financing is worth a look specifically if the bottleneck is outdated hardware that can’t interface with your EHR. Match the tool to the actual gap instead of defaulting to whatever your bank offers first.
What to do this week
- Pull your AR aging report and flag any claims tied to remote monitoring or wearable data services that are unpaid past 45 days.
- Call your top three payers and get written confirmation on which RPM/RTM codes they’re actually reimbursing today, not last year.
- Stop expanding wearable data programs until you’ve confirmed a clean billing pathway exists for the patients already enrolled.
- Talk to your billing staff about where documentation is falling apart, that’s usually where reimbursement stalls, not at the payer.
- If cash is tight now, look at what percentage of your receivables could be factored to cover payroll and supply costs this month rather than waiting on slow-pay claims.
This isn’t the first time healthcare has had to run a business through a reimbursement gap the industry created. Our case study on alternatives to bank financing covers how a small business navigated a similar timing mismatch without taking on debt it couldn’t service. The invoice factoring guide is a good starting point if you’ve never used receivables financing before and want to understand the mechanics.
FAQ
Can invoice factoring cover claims that are still pending due to coding or reimbursement disputes?
Factoring works on billed, valid receivables, not projected or disputed revenue. If a claim tied to wearable data monitoring has been submitted and is aging in your AR, it may be eligible. Eligibility, advance rates, and terms vary by credit profile and payer mix, and are subject to underwriting.
Should a practice keep investing in remote monitoring while reimbursement rules are unsettled?
That’s a clinical and business decision specific to your patient population and payer contracts. From a cash flow standpoint, the safer move is confirming a billable pathway exists before scaling a program, not after.
How fast can a practice get cash from factoring compared to waiting on a payer?
Factoring is generally designed to be faster than standard payer reimbursement cycles, but actual funding speed depends on your documentation, claim quality, and underwriting review. Speed is not guaranteed and varies by situation.
Is a working capital loan a better fit than factoring for this problem?
It depends on what you’re funding. If the gap is aging receivables, factoring is usually the more direct fit. If you need capital for new equipment or a broader operating cushion beyond your AR, a short-term loan may fit better. Both are subject to underwriting and vary by credit profile.
{“@context”:”https://schema.org”,”@type”:”FAQPage”,”mainEntity”:[{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Can invoice factoring cover claims that are still pending due to coding or reimbursement disputes?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Factoring works on billed, valid receivables, not projected or disputed revenue. If a claim tied to wearable data monitoring has been submitted and is aging in your AR, it may be eligible. Eligibility, advance rates, and terms vary by credit profile and payer mix, and are subject to underwriting.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Should a practice keep investing in remote monitoring while reimbursement rules are unsettled?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”That’s a clinical and business decision specific to your patient population and payer contracts. From a cash flow standpoint, the safer move is confirming a billable pathway exists before scaling a program, not after.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”How fast can a practice get cash from factoring compared to waiting on a payer?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”Factoring is generally designed to be faster than standard payer reimbursement cycles, but actual funding speed depends on your documentation, claim quality, and underwriting review. Speed is not guaranteed and varies by situation.”}},{“@type”:”Question”,”name”:”Is a working capital loan a better fit than factoring for this problem?”,”acceptedAnswer”:{“@type”:”Answer”,”text”:”It depends on what you’re funding. If the gap is aging receivables, factoring is usually the more direct fit. If you need capital for new equipment or a broader operating cushion beyond your AR, a short-term loan may fit better. Both are subject to underwriting and vary by credit profile.”}}]}
This article is for general informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute financial, legal, tax, or investment advice. Factoring terms vary by business, credit profile, and industry, and nothing here is an offer or guarantee of funding, rates, or approval. Consult a qualified professional before making financial decisions.
Tired of waiting to get paid? See what Factor & Fund can do for a business like yours. Apply in minutes. Approval and terms are subject to underwriting, and no outcome is guaranteed.